IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v62y2026i3p910-926.html

Executive Monetary Compensation Incentives, Equity Incentives, and Corporate Default Risk: Empirical Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Guo
  • Haiyang Gao

Abstract

Executive incentives serve as a core mechanism in corporate governance, with different incentive structures exerting distinct effects on corporate default risk. This study investigates the impact of executive incentives on corporate default risk and its underlying mechanisms, focusing on two primary forms: executive monetary compensation incentives and equity incentives. Using data from China’s A-share listed enterprises spanning 2005–2022, the empirical findings reveal that: (1) Executive monetary compensation incentives significantly reduce corporate default risk, whereas equity incentives exhibit a U-shaped relationship with default risk, indicating the existence of an optimal threshold—both insufficient and excessive equity incentives elevate default risk; (2) Agency costs and financing constraints mediate the effect of monetary compensation incentives, while managerial myopia functions as the transmission channel for equity incentives; (3) Heterogeneous effects emerge across firms with distinct ownership types and organizational life cycle stages.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Guo & Haiyang Gao, 2026. "Executive Monetary Compensation Incentives, Equity Incentives, and Corporate Default Risk: Empirical Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(3), pages 910-926, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:62:y:2026:i:3:p:910-926
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2025.2547754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2547754
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2547754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:62:y:2026:i:3:p:910-926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.