IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v61y2025i5p1219-1235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can High-Quality Interactions Reduce the Regulatory Inquiries Received by Firms? Evidence from Interactive Investor Platforms in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yujie Zhao
  • Ping Zhu
  • Zixuan Zhang
  • Ping Zhou

Abstract

Utilizing data from online interactive investor platforms (IIPs) in China, we find that high-quality interactions between investors and listed companies significantly reduce the incidence of regulatory inquiries. This reduction is primarily achieved through alleviating information asymmetry and enhancing corporate governance. Our conclusions have proven robust across various tests. Additional analysis finds that a higher response ratio, greater detail in responses, clearer readability, and timeliness in replies correlate with fewer regulatory inquiries. The reduction effect is more pronounced in firms with weaker external monitoring and more sophisticated board secretaries. Furthermore, our findings indicate that interactions on IIPs can mitigate adverse market reactions to regulatory inquiries. These insights underscore the importance of fostering transparent and effective communication channels between investors and firms, highlighting their significant implications for improving the information environment in capital markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Yujie Zhao & Ping Zhu & Zixuan Zhang & Ping Zhou, 2025. "Can High-Quality Interactions Reduce the Regulatory Inquiries Received by Firms? Evidence from Interactive Investor Platforms in China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(5), pages 1219-1235, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:5:p:1219-1235
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2024.2412070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2024.2412070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2024.2412070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:5:p:1219-1235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.