IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v61y2025i14p4527-4544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digitization of Inputs and Comparability of Accounting Information: A U-Shaped Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Desheng Liu
  • Xinran Wang
  • Shuman Chen

Abstract

The integration of digital and physical domains accelerates the digitalization of enterprises, prompting a growing focus on digital inputs, which profoundly impacts the environment in which accounting information is generated. Thus, do digital inputs enhance or diminish the quality of accounting information? We propose a conceptual model based on strategic differentiation and internal control, finding that the impact of digital inputs on accounting information comparability follows a U-shaped trajectory of “suppression and enhancement,” rather than a linear relationship of “either-or.” Mechanism tests indicate that strategic differentiation and internal control quality are key channels through which digital inputs influence accounting information comparability. Additionally, external investors’ attention negatively moderates the U-shaped relationship between digital input and the comparability of accounting information. Further analysis reveals that the U-shaped relationship is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises, in the eastern region, with high levels of managerial myopia, and under high analyst scrutiny.

Suggested Citation

  • Desheng Liu & Xinran Wang & Shuman Chen, 2025. "Digitization of Inputs and Comparability of Accounting Information: A U-Shaped Relationship," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(14), pages 4527-4544, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:14:p:4527-4544
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2025.2520373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2520373
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2520373?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:14:p:4527-4544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.