IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v61y2025i13p3973-3988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stimulation or Inhibition? Exploring the Role of Economic Policy Uncertainty in Technological Progress

Author

Listed:
  • Pai-Chin Huang
  • Chia-Ling Yao
  • Cheng-To Lin
  • Cristi Spulbar

Abstract

Exploring the pivotal significance of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) holds paramount importance in promoting technological progress in China. In this study, we utilize a wavelet-transform quantile-on-quantile regression (QQR) approach to analyze the intricate influences from EPU to technological innovation (TI), under the control of government expenditure on science and technology (GE). Quantitative result reveals that, in the short term, a low level of EPU functions as a catalyst for technological progress, whereas moderate-to-high levels of EPU hinder TI. This trend underscores that although a certain degree of economic policy uncertainty can spur technological advancements, excessive uncertainty would become an obstacle. However, over the medium to long term, it becomes clear that the positive impact of EPU on TI gains greater significance, as relevant entities are more capable of adapting to their specific circumstances and market demands, ultimately achieving greater technological progress than in the short term. In the midst of growing economic policy turbulence, we will put forth insightful proposals to navigate the challenges posed by uncertain economic policies while simultaneously promoting innovation and technological growth in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Pai-Chin Huang & Chia-Ling Yao & Cheng-To Lin & Cristi Spulbar, 2025. "Stimulation or Inhibition? Exploring the Role of Economic Policy Uncertainty in Technological Progress," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(13), pages 3973-3988, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:13:p:3973-3988
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2025.2501763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2501763
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2501763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:13:p:3973-3988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.