IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v61y2025i12p3711-3723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Customers’ Negative Managerial Expectations and Suppliers’ Dual Innovation: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Liu
  • Chuan Zhang

Abstract

This study analyses the correlation between customers’ negative managerial expectations and suppliers’ binary innovations under supply chain risk scenarios. The findings suggest that suppliers are more likely to promote radical rather than incremental innovation when customers express negative managerial expectations. Customers’ negative managerial expectations are more likely to encourage breakthrough innovations if the supplier has weaker bargaining power, lower financial constraints, higher tolerance for innovation failure, and is located in a more competitive market region. Mechanism tests indicate that customers’ negative managerial expectations increase suppliers’ business risks and stimulate suppliers to engage in breakthrough innovations. Economic consequences tests suggest that when customers hold negative expectations about the future, suppliers’ breakthrough innovation increases their industry position and product novelty. This study provides empirical evidence that helps firm management to improve supply chain innovation to address customer risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Liu & Chuan Zhang, 2025. "Customers’ Negative Managerial Expectations and Suppliers’ Dual Innovation: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(12), pages 3711-3723, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:12:p:3711-3723
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2025.2488214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2488214
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2488214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:12:p:3711-3723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.