IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v61y2025i11p3446-3460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Rapid Mortality Improvement Resolve the Annuity Puzzle?: Evidence from South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Dong-Hwa Lee
  • HyunJung Kim
  • Daehwan Kim

Abstract

Motivated by South Korea’s rapid improvement in the mortality rate, we analyze the actuarial fairness of annuity products for the general population and shed light on the annuity puzzle in South Korea. To consider the effect of mortality improvement more accurately, we apply a stochastic mortality model to estimate future mortality rates and the money’s worth ratio (MWR) to evaluate the actuarial fairness of annuity products. Our results indicate that annuity products in South Korea remain unattractive to the general population owing to adverse selection, despite significant improvements in mortality rates. Furthermore, we find that the impact of adverse selection is greater for males, resulting in lower annuity product values than for females. Additionally, for the general Korean population, the payout guarantee option of annuity products improves the MWR with increasing age, despite the associated guarantee costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong-Hwa Lee & HyunJung Kim & Daehwan Kim, 2025. "Does Rapid Mortality Improvement Resolve the Annuity Puzzle?: Evidence from South Korea," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(11), pages 3446-3460, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:11:p:3446-3460
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2025.2485225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2485225
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2485225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:11:p:3446-3460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.