IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v61y2025i10p3232-3259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Too Much or Too Little? The Inverted U-shaped Relationship between Corporate Shadow Banking Activities and Green Production Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Sijing Li
  • Yingkai Yin
  • Qiuyun Zhao
  • Jennhae Liou

Abstract

Under the theme of financial support for the real economy, we suggest that corporate shadow banking activities should enhance highquality economic development. Using a sample of nonfinancial listed companies from 2010 to 2021, we empirically test the inverted Ushaped relationship between corporate shadow banking and green production efficiency. The results show that moderate participation in shadow banking improves green production efficiency, while excessive participation hinders it. This relationship remains robust through instrumental variable methods, propensity score matching, and other tests. Mechanism analysis reveals that shadow banking activities impacts green production efficiency through economic and environmental benefits. Heterogeneity analysis finds that green institutional investors, high regional capital intensity, and command-and-control environmental policies mitigate the negative effects of shadow banking, while in non-state-owned enterprises, small firms, and those facing high financing constraints, the inverted U-shaped relationship remains. Additionally, threshold effects indicate that moderate financial supervision and environmental regulation maximize shadow banking’s positive impact on green production efficiency. Our findings provide guidance for aligning financial services with real economic needs and promoting sustainable economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Sijing Li & Yingkai Yin & Qiuyun Zhao & Jennhae Liou, 2025. "Too Much or Too Little? The Inverted U-shaped Relationship between Corporate Shadow Banking Activities and Green Production Efficiency," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(10), pages 3232-3259, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:10:p:3232-3259
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2025.2460663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2460663
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2460663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:61:y:2025:i:10:p:3232-3259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.