IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v56y2020i13p3217-3234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Power and Efficiency in the Iranian Banking Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Amin Haghnejad
  • Saeed Samadi
  • Khadije Nasrollahi
  • Karim Azarbayjani
  • Iraj Kazemi

Abstract

This paper explores the nature of the causal relationship between market power and cost efficiency for a sample of banks operating in the Iranian banking industry over the period 2002–2014. In particular, a bootstrap panel Granger causality approach is used to test the “quiet life”, “banking specificities”, and “efficient-structure” hypotheses, accounting for both slope heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. The results indicate that, on average, banks’ market power (measured by the efficiency-adjusted Lerner index) has steadily declined over the study period, while cost efficiency (measured by the SFA approach) has improved over the period. Furthermore, the results of the causality analysis suggest that there is a negative unidirectional causality running from market power to cost efficiency for 56.25% of banks, providing evidence to support the “quiet life” hypothesis, according to which banks with greater market power would be less cost-efficient. Such a result clearly rejects the “banking specificities” and “efficient-structure” hypotheses which predict a positive Granger causality in the same and opposite directions, respectively. These results are robust to the use of an alternative Granger non-causality procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Amin Haghnejad & Saeed Samadi & Khadije Nasrollahi & Karim Azarbayjani & Iraj Kazemi, 2020. "Market Power and Efficiency in the Iranian Banking Industry," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(13), pages 3217-3234, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:56:y:2020:i:13:p:3217-3234
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2019.1643716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1643716
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1643716?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:56:y:2020:i:13:p:3217-3234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.