IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v56y2020i12p2826-2851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Macroprudential Policies under Maturity Mismatch

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Yang
  • Yuhuan Yi

Abstract

This paper studies the role of reserve requirements as a macroprudential policy tool in China. In a factor-augmented vector autoregression of China, we find that banking system works as a shock absorber. To explain this “financial attenuator” effect, we extend an otherwise standard New-Keynesian model including (i) a banking sector with financial frictions with households, (ii) a credit in multi-period contracts, (iii) a central bank that conducts monetary policy by adjusting the nominal interest rate in response to the money-growth rate, and (iv) the reserve requirement (RR) as a macroprudential policy instrument. The quantitative analysis of the estimated model shows that the presence of a maturity mismatch makes a bank’s leverage less procyclical, which offsets the effects of financial frictions and makes the bank’s balance sheet function as a shock absorber. Our analysis also suggests that countercyclical RR adjustment can enhance welfare compared to fixed an RR ratio in the presence of a maturity mismatch but faces important implementation challenges. In particular, an RR policy countercyclically responding to bank lending can effectively stabilize the economy but increase financial fragility, as the “credit attenuator” effect stemming from the maturity mismatch will be offset by this policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Yang & Yuhuan Yi, 2020. "Effectiveness of Macroprudential Policies under Maturity Mismatch," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(12), pages 2826-2851, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:56:y:2020:i:12:p:2826-2851
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2019.1627194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1627194
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1627194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:56:y:2020:i:12:p:2826-2851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.