IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/eaeuec/v42y2004i1p75-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soft Budget Constraints, Enterprise Restructuring, and Economic Reform Policy: The Cases of Bulgaria and Romania

Author

Listed:
  • GELU CALACEAN
  • PAUL ALIGICA

Abstract

This article uses the soft budget constraint (SBC) approach in order to explore an important facet of Romanian and Bulgarian economic reform experiences in the post-communist period. Comparative analysis framed on SBC lines reveals several major areas of convergence and divergence between the policies adopted by the two states, and explains the success and failure of solving the crucial problem of enterprise restructuring in these two countries. With these ends in view, the article outlines the notion of SBC and discusses its relevance for transition economies. It provides a brief overview of the ways in which various methods address and present the SBC problem. Finally SBC and enterprise restructuring in the context of general reform packages in Bulgaria and Romania are addressed in the light of the conceptual and analytic clarifications presented in the article.

Suggested Citation

  • Gelu Calacean & Paul Aligica, 2004. "Soft Budget Constraints, Enterprise Restructuring, and Economic Reform Policy: The Cases of Bulgaria and Romania," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 75-95, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:eaeuec:v:42:y:2004:i:1:p:75-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=2TH4J06F7V8UDF1T
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nikolay NENOVSKY & Kiril TOCHKOV & Camélia TURCU, 2011. "Monetary Regimes and EU Accession: Comparing Bulgaria and Romania," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 1251, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:eaeuec:v:42:y:2004:i:1:p:75-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MEEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.