IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/chinec/v59y2026i4p386-398.html

Common Prosperity Across the Urban-Rural Divide: From Street Stalls to Small Farms—Early Signs of a Great Reversal?

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Hayward

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that the return of the ‘common prosperity’ slogan to prominence in Chinese policy discourse in relation to the urban-rural divide is a response to a set of unexpected dilemmas encountered in the course of China’s unfolding development trajectory. A transitional developmental form emerged over several decades, mostly taking shape with a set of policies under the slogan of ‘urban-rural integration’ during the Hu-Wen era. While this was initially intended to dismantle the in-built inequalities established during the Mao years, a series of unforeseen crises has resulted in ongoing and renewed processes of extraction from the countryside. Recent studies show that attempts to equalize and stabilize relations between the urban-rural divide premised upon the urban supporting the rural have produced a developmental form which currently appears unsustainable. This has led to uncertainty and contestation among China’s leading policymakers, and between the center and localities. I suggest that seemingly marginal policy discussions on street stalls and small household farms are an indication of a breakdown in a previously precarious consensus among policymakers. How these debates unfold will provide analysts with important insights into the direction of policymaking, and the future trajectory of China’s development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Hayward, 2026. "Common Prosperity Across the Urban-Rural Divide: From Street Stalls to Small Farms—Early Signs of a Great Reversal?," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(4), pages 386-398, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:59:y:2026:i:4:p:386-398
    DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2026.2649708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10971475.2026.2649708
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10971475.2026.2649708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:59:y:2026:i:4:p:386-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.