IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/chinec/v59y2026i1p37-54.html

Diplomatic Impact of Overseas Investments: Evidence from China’s Belt and Road Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • Miao Wang

Abstract

With the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), Chinese enterprises have dramatically expanded their overseas investments. This study examines how these investments affect bilateral diplomatic relations using a panel dataset of BRI countries from 2005–2020. Contrary to conventional commercial peace theory, our findings reveal that Chinese investments tend to intensify bilateral diplomatic disagreements, with this effect being more pronounced in developed countries. We find significant heterogeneity across investment types and sectors: cross-border mergers and acquisitions generate substantial diplomatic friction, while greenfield investments show limited impact; similarly, investments in natural resources trigger stronger diplomatic pushback than infrastructure projects. These patterns persist across multiple measures of diplomatic relations and withstand rigorous instrumental variable and event study approaches. Our findings contribute to understanding the complex interplay between economic interdependence and diplomatic relations in an era of shifting geopolitical alignments, suggesting that the diplomatic consequences of investment flows are contingent on their specific characteristics rather than simply their magnitude. These insights offer important implications for investment policy, economic statecraft, and the management of China’s expanding global economic footprint.

Suggested Citation

  • Miao Wang, 2026. "Diplomatic Impact of Overseas Investments: Evidence from China’s Belt and Road Initiative," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 37-54, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:59:y:2026:i:1:p:37-54
    DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2025.2497107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10971475.2025.2497107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10971475.2025.2497107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:59:y:2026:i:1:p:37-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.