IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/chinec/v59y2026i1p1-16.html

Industrial Policy in the Competition Between an Existing Hegemon and a Rising Superpower: The Case of the US and China

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Honglin Zhang

Abstract

Central to the current US-China geopolitical rivalry is the strategic use of industrial policy (IP) by both countries, which is an unexpected reverse of view on IP. This paper examines the role of IP in the economic competition between the US, the incumbent global hegemon, and China, the rising superpower. Both countries increasingly view IP as essential to winning the rivalry. While the methods differ –more market-driven in the US and more state-led in China - their IP reflects shared goals: securing technological leadership and strengthening national security through self-reliance. China’s IP works well in achieving scale, coordination, and technological catch-up, particularly in manufacturing and infrastructure-based sectors. Its strategy can effectively target national priorities but may limit creativity and dynamic innovation. IP in the US works better in fostering breakthrough innovations in fields like artificial intelligence (AI), biotechnology, and quantum computing. But the US may need to improve its long-term planning and government support for critical technologies like semiconductors and clean energy. The two models are likely to coexist, each dominating different areas of technological competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Honglin Zhang, 2026. "Industrial Policy in the Competition Between an Existing Hegemon and a Rising Superpower: The Case of the US and China," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:59:y:2026:i:1:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2025.2469198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10971475.2025.2469198
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10971475.2025.2469198?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:59:y:2026:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.