IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/chinec/v57y2024i5p395-414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Political Connections Help or Harm Family Firms? An Audit Pricing Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Pat Yan Cheung
  • Tak Yan Leung

Abstract

Past business ethics research highlights negative perceptions about corporate governance of family firms, and yet many auditors evaluate family businesses favorably and charge them lower audit fees; however, this inconsistency remains unexplained. Moreover, the impact of family firms’ political connections and board gender diversity on audit fees is still not clear. Based on the data from listed Chinese family firms, we address these important research gaps by using the local institutional environment in which the client operates as a moderator of the process by which auditors assess the implications of clients’ political connections. Political connections reduce audit fees when a client is located in a region with high-quality public administration. Female representation in audit committees positively moderates the relationship between political connections and audit fees, as female committee members react to their firms’ political connections by demanding higher levels of assurance from auditors. Female committee members also demand higher audit efforts for family firms managed by non–family-member CEOs.

Suggested Citation

  • Pat Yan Cheung & Tak Yan Leung, 2024. "Do Political Connections Help or Harm Family Firms? An Audit Pricing Perspective," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 395-414, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:57:y:2024:i:5:p:395-414
    DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2024.2321706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10971475.2024.2321706
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10971475.2024.2321706?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:57:y:2024:i:5:p:395-414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.