Author
Abstract
This paper examines the relative influence of the volatilities of Chinese and American trade with Africa, by exploring the volatilities, their comovements, and four potential international drivers that can increase or decrease the volatilities. The drivers considered are Euro Area’s trade with Africa; U.S. recessions; economic globalization; and fluctuations in China’s economy. The paper employs the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC-) generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) model and monthly data spanning 1970M1 to 2020M07. The results show that, without controlling for drivers, the volatilities of Chinese and American trade with Africa are quite high, with similar magnitudes and significant comovements. When drivers are controlled for, Euro Area’s trade does not influence the volatilities significantly. However, America’s recessions make Chinese trade volatility to become higher, while economic globalization makes it to become lower, relative to America’s trade volatility. These results imply that Chinese trade volatility is more influential than America’s trade volatility, due to two international drivers. Furthermore, fluctuations in China’s economy significantly influence the trade volatility of China itself and the trade volatility of the bigger economy, the U.S., which confirms China’s significant international influence. One of the key policy implications of these findings is that globalization does not necessarily increase trade volatility in all contexts. This paper provides new evidence that in the context of a single trade market, globalization is an antidote of trade volatility because it involves the availability of diverse markets across the global economy, which consequently reduces the panic of traders within the single market.
Suggested Citation
Adesola Ibironke, 2023.
"The Volatilities of Chinese and American Trade with Africa: Which Country’s Trade Volatility is the Most Influential?,"
Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 220-243, May.
Handle:
RePEc:mes:chinec:v:56:y:2023:i:3:p:220-243
DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2022.2132699
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:56:y:2023:i:3:p:220-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCES20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.