IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/chinec/v56y2023i2p104-123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Different Levels of Income Inequality on Subjective Well-Being in China: A Panel Data Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sho Komatsu
  • Aya Suzuki

Abstract

Income inequality is one of the most serious issues globally and China is the representative examples of this issue. Income inequality remains high in China and may negatively affects subjective well-being. This study clarifies whether income inequality affects subjective well-being in China. Using five waves of the 2010-2018 data from China Family Panel Studies, a panel data analysis reveals the following: First, general income inequality measured by provincial Gini coefficients has a significant U-shaped impact. Second, between-group income inequality, measured as income ratio between urban hukou residents and migrants with rural hukou, has a significant U-shaped impact. Third, urban-rural income inequality measured by provincial urban to rural household per capita income ratio has an inverted-U-shaped impact. To address endogeneity problems of income inequality, this study adopts instrumental variable approach. For the further robustness checks of the validity of the instrumental variable used, this study adopts the recent Conley et al. (2012) bounds approach. Our results are robust after addressing endogeneity problem. One important policy implication stemming from our results is the need to adopt strategies that ensure a more inclusive society without hukou-related and urban–rural discrimination.

Suggested Citation

  • Sho Komatsu & Aya Suzuki, 2023. "The Impact of Different Levels of Income Inequality on Subjective Well-Being in China: A Panel Data Analysis," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 104-123, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:56:y:2023:i:2:p:104-123
    DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2022.2096809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10971475.2022.2096809
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10971475.2022.2096809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:56:y:2023:i:2:p:104-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.