Author
Abstract
The Duterte administration has adopted a positive attitude toward China; however, Filipino people are cautious in cooperating with China because of Chinese behavior in the South China Sea dispute and the country’s increasing influence on the world economy and regional security. The Filipino business sector’s stance on this collaboration is closer to that of the government’s because the BRI is perceived as a good business opportunity. Although there are diverging stances toward China and the BRI among state, people, and businesses in Philippines, these differences have not influenced President Duterte’s decision to cooperate with China under the framework of the BRI. The Duterte administration shelved differences pertaining to the South China Sea dispute first and then participated in the Chinese government’s BRI. Philippines’ government has tried to combine China’s funding and technology with Philippines’ Build, Build, Build program to improve domestic infrastructure, expand export of agriculture products to China, and increase economic growth rate. The Duterte administration has thus expanded cooperation with China for benefits in terms of economy, trade, science and technology, agriculture, education, tourism, and infrastructure through the BRI. The implications of the above actions taken by Philippines’ government include promotion of Philippines’ economic and infrastructure developments and elimination of security threats from China without the United States’ support through cooperation with China by participation in the BRI. Hence, shelving the South China Sea dispute is a means of promoting cooperation between the Philippines and China. The Duterte administration hopes to neutralize the effects of the pro-United States foreign policy in the past by cooperating with China in favor of maximum national interest.
Suggested Citation
Wen-Chih Chao, 2021.
"The Philippines’ Perception and Strategy for China’s Belt and Road Initiative Expansion: Hedging with Balancing,"
Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 48-55, January.
Handle:
RePEc:mes:chinec:v:54:y:2021:i:1:p:48-55
DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2020.1809817
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:54:y:2021:i:1:p:48-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCES20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.