IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/chinec/v51y2018i2p116-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Performance Evaluation of Public Welfare Fund Based on DEA - Tobit Model: Chongqing Example

Author

Listed:
  • Gao Jing
  • Liu Jing

Abstract

Social transformation caused by the rapid development of the public welfare fund has become an important third party power of social governance. Chongqing city, is an example of a municipality directly under the central government and urban and rural reform pilot area and the public welfare fund has played an important role in resolving social contradictions and improving social governance capacity. Based on the Chongqing 27 public welfare fund 2013 annual assessment report data, using the DEA– Tobit two-stage method, we have evaluated the organization’s social performance and economic performance and its influencing factors. The results show that comprehensive technical efficiency of 27 fund average is 0.905, with 40.7% of organizations achieving the production frontier. For nonefficient organizations, Tobit regression results showed that the raise type, financial assets management, project innovation, and sustainability have a positive influence on the comprehensive technical efficiency (TE), pure technical efficiency (PTE) and scale efficiency (SE). Social donation has a positive effect on TE and PTE, and human resource management is an important factor of PTE. At last, we put forward policy suggestions from three aspects: human capital management, project innovation, and the organization operation standard.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao Jing & Liu Jing, 2018. "Research on the Performance Evaluation of Public Welfare Fund Based on DEA - Tobit Model: Chongqing Example," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 116-129, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:51:y:2018:i:2:p:116-129
    DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2018.1447783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10971475.2018.1447783
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10971475.2018.1447783?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:51:y:2018:i:2:p:116-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.