IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Empirical Study of Coal Mine Safety Regulation in China

Listed author(s):
  • Xiao Xingzhi
  • Qi Yingfei
  • Li Hongjuan
Registered author(s):

    This article uses a VAR model to empirically test Chinese coal mine safety regulations based on a theoretical analysis of their outcomes. The results show that the mine safety regulations are effective over the long term, represented by the long-term drop in casualty rates per million tons of coal. This is offset in the short term by the adverse behavior of coal miners, meaning that regulatory institutions must make trade-offs between long-term and short-term effects. The empirical analysis also finds that increases in coal output will lower the casualty rate per million tons of coal in the short term, but increase it in the long term. Based on these empirical results, the paper offers policy recommendations for improving China's coal mine safety regulations.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by M.E. Sharpe, Inc. in its journal Chinese Economy.

    Volume (Year): 43 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 4 (July)
    Pages: 73-92

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:43:y:2010:i:4:p:73-92
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:43:y:2010:i:4:p:73-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.