IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mutual Restraint, Mutual Promotion!


  • Qin Hui


Over the past few years, Eastern and Western cultures have once again become popular topics of comparative study. Unlike the "cultural heat" (>i>wenhua re>/i>) of recent vintage with its study of values, this new approach is focused much more on comparing political and economic systems.>sup>1>/sup> The two most important concepts for analysisâ"economic freedom" and "economic democracy"âare both products of the West, though this time around there is little consideration of "human nature" as the primordial element of the argument. Despite this continued domination of Western notions, many people have concluded that in China's recent history the system that existed prior to reform was, in fact, more "economically democratic" than its Western counterparts where excessive freedom needed to be corrected by the introduction of Mao Zedong's vision of "economic democracy." Others, of course, take a different, though still nationalist, view, namely, that the height of "economic freedom" in China was achieved under the traditional system that had existed for thousands of years prior to the Opium Wars in the mid-nineteenth century. It, too, was superior to the system in the West where excessive democracy requires correction by the introduction of Confucian principles of "economic freedom." As opposite as these views are, they share two common points: (1) both assert the superiority of Chinaâeither in its pre-1978 reform or traditional, pre-Opium War modeâto the West, something presented as a source of national pride; and (2) both argue that economic freedom and economic democracy are contradictory principles involving "mutual restraint" (>i>xiangke>/i>).

Suggested Citation

  • Qin Hui, 1999. "Mutual Restraint, Mutual Promotion!," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 79-84, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:32:y:1999:i:4:p:79-84

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:32:y:1999:i:4:p:79-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.