IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Government as a Public Organ

Listed author(s):
  • Fan Gang
Registered author(s):

    As China enters the stage of economic and social reform, some people think that the introduction of markets will somehow weaken or reduce the power of government over society. Popular indeed is the view that the market equals "anarchism" (>i>wuzhengfu>/i>). Establishing the market mechanism does require government controls to be limited and state authority to retreat from domains outside its legitimate regulatory functions, so as to improve its performance in the normal arenas of operation, namely, ensuring social order and mediating conflicts over property, and so forth. Contrast this with the extensive role the state played in the central planning system in which the government "became a capitalist owner" (>i>dang ziben suoyouzhe>/i>) "managing enterprises" (>i>guan qiye>/i>) and "supervising production" (>i>guan shengchan>/i>), all rolled up into one. But, at the same time, this almighty state machine was intimately involved in economic management, it patently failed to fulfill its more conventional role of ensuring the availability and ample supply of "public goods" (>i>gonggong wupin>/i>). State administrators stuck their noses into every aspect of economic decision makingâfrom heavy and light industry to servicesâbut when it came to provisioning public amenities, such as good roads, schools, and sewage systems, these same administrators were nowhere to be found.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by M.E. Sharpe, Inc. in its journal Chinese Economy.

    Volume (Year): 32 (1999)
    Issue (Month): 4 (July)
    Pages: 18-28

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:32:y:1999:i:4:p:18-28
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:32:y:1999:i:4:p:18-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.