Guest Editor's Introduction
Remember when studies of the Chinese economy dealt primarily with the "thought" of Communist Party leaders and the dicta of the Chinese state? When the "masses" were portrayed as happily embracing "socialism" in the countryside and city? When capitalism and markets were a demonic evil, promoted by equally malicious leaders such as Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping, and considered inappropriate to Chinese conditions? When Western visitors to China trekked into such places as the Dazhai agricultural brigade and the Daqing oil field to examine these "models" of economic and social development? When the likes of Chen Yonggui and Lei Feng were the subject of academic forums and collegial discussions at major universities? And Chinese sources on the economy were long on rhetoric and short on data? Well, as Dorothy said to Toto in >i>The Wizard of Oz>/i>, "We're not in Kansas anymore." China and Chinese studies have changed forever.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 30 (1997)
Issue (Month): 5 (September)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=110901|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:30:y:1997:i:5:p:3-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Chris Nguyen to update the entry or send us the correct address
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.