IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Institutional Change, Market Evolution, and Informal Contractual Arrangements

  • Chen Yu
Registered author(s):

    The major developments in the study of institutional economics in recent years has greatly deepened people's understanding of institutional change and market evolution. Generally speaking, institutional change is headed in the general direction of the continuous reduction of market transaction costs, allowing the owners of all sorts of resources to realize to the greatest extent possible their behavior in the course of transaction, and at the same time, to cause resources to flow into the hands of those for whom their use value would be the greatest, thus promoting the growth of the economy (North and Thomas, 1973). According to the general theory of institutional change, there are two types of institutional arrangements: first, fundamental institutional arrangements, and second, secondary institutional arrangements. In a gradualistic process of historical change, secondary institutional changes may well take place before there is a fundamental institutional change. "Such changes that have the effect of deviating from, amending, and modifying, or circumventing the existing fundamental institutional arrangement will continue to generate pressure, thus eventually bringing about more radical change in the fundamental institutional arrangement" (North and Thomas, 1971).

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=27757T08523V257K
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by M.E. Sharpe, Inc. in its journal Chinese Economy.

    Volume (Year): 29 (1996)
    Issue (Month): 5 (September)
    Pages: 5-30

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:29:y:1996:i:5:p:5-30
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=110901

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:29:y:1996:i:5:p:5-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)

    The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Chris Nguyen to update the entry or send us the correct address

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.