IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Impact of Sino-South Korean Diplomatic Relations on Trade and Economic Relations in Northeast Asia

Listed author(s):
  • Zhao Chuanjun
Registered author(s):

    Northeast Asia (NEA) had once been an extremely complicated region beset with interlocking political and national hostilities. Conflicts existed on the social, military, and ideological planes, in addition to hostility between South and North Korea and the NEA people's historical hatred of Japan. The situation was largely influenced by political relations and typically politically oriented. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the enormous changes that have overtaken Eastern Europe, the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Russia and relaxation of tension between South and North Korea, economic and technological cooperation in the area has made a breakthrough; the previously political orientation has begun to be replaced by an economic orientation. Development and cooperation have increasingly become the mainstream. However, peace and stability have not been established, and realistic and potential political contradictions still largely restrict overall and in-depth economic and technological cooperation. The most obvious and important of these contradictions are the one between North and South Korea and the Russo-Japanese dispute over the "northern territories." As everyone knows, NorthâSouth Korean relation greatly influenced Sino-South Korean economic and technological cooperation, and the still-unresolved "northern territories" dispute is a major obstacle to development of Russo-Japanese economic and trade relations. The establishment of diplomatic relations between China and South Korea can be said to be a major historical breatkthough in political relations in NEA. First, it eliminated the forty-year Sino-South Korean hostility and pushed overall economic and technological cooperation to a new stage. Second, it made the U.S. military presence in South Korea even less reasonable, thus weakening the basis of military confrontation in NEA and creating the conditions for long-term peace and stability. In addition, it greatly weakened North-South Korean political hostility and military confrontation, acting as a catalyst for peaceful unification. At the same time, Sino-South Korean diplomatic relations will also promote North-South economic exchange and cooperation, enabling northern Korea to enter the mainstream of economic and technological cooperation in NEA at a faster pace. Finally, it will act as a model and stimulus to overall resolution of the Russo-Japanese dispute. Although the crux of the problem in Russo-Japanese relations is different in nature from that between China and South Korea, Sino-South Korean diplomatic relations will stimulate greater enthusiasm by these two neighboring countries to seek a solution. Furthermore, although the Taiwan administration was extremely unhappy at these diplomatic relations, eventually, they will help to improve Taiwan-mainland relations and induce the Taiwan business world to engage more actively in economic and trade cooperation with the mainland and the entire NEA region. Under their influence, relations between North Korea and Japanese are also expected to improve, and Japan, after reassessing South Korea's position and role in NEA economic and technological cooperation, is expected to engage more actively in this cooperation.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by M.E. Sharpe, Inc. in its journal Chinese Economy.

    Volume (Year): 27 (1994)
    Issue (Month): 4 (July)
    Pages: 61-70

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:27:y:1994:i:4:p:61-70
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:27:y:1994:i:4:p:61-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.