In recent years not only has the rapid economic development of the People's Republic of China continued to catch people's attention but the emergence of a so-called "Greater China" has similarly become a topic of wide-ranging discussion. Greater China is by no means a precise term, as the articles included here make evident. Among the names that have been suggested are: "Greater Chinese Common Market," "Economic Sphere of Both Sides of the Straits," "Southeastern Chinese Free Trade Zone," "Chinese Economic Coordination System for Common Economic Prosperity," and simply "Chinese Sphere." The bewildering variety of names is not just the normal academic penchant for coining new names but often carry different connotations that have different economic and sometimes political implications. Thus Chinese scholars on Taiwan frequently prefer names, such as the Chinese Common Market, that imply a coming together on an equal political basis, as the states of Europe did to form the Common Market. PRC scholars, on the other hand, shy away from names that either imply political equality among the parties involved or that suggest a PRC design to control the economies of other places, such as Singapore and Southeast Asia. Thus Li Poxi, director of the Development Forecast Division of the State Council's Development Research Center, uses the rather unwieldy term "Chinese Economic Coordination System for Common Economic Prosperity." Just as the names different scholars have used vary, so do the concepts that they have in mind. Professor Chu-yuan Cheng, for instance, seems to include Singapore in his concept of a Chinese Common Market for the specific purpose that any agreement that included Singapore would implicitly treat other political entities, such as Taiwan, as nation-states. In contrast, PRC scholars tend to exclude places such as Singapore, at least for the establishment of any sort of formal cooperation, for the same reason that Professor Cheng would like to see it included. Other scholars see a "Greater China" by whatever name as not only including Taiwan, Hong Kong, and southeastern China but also the Chinese communities of Southeast Asia.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 26 (1993)
Issue (Month): 6 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=110901 |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:26:y:1993:i:6:p:3-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Chris Nguyen to update the entry or send us the correct address
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.