Theoretical discussions on economic structural reform in the Dengist period can probably be dated from Hu Qiaomu's important speech to the State Council, "Act in Accordance with Economic Laws," in July 1978. Following that speech, it became legitimate to explore the "economic laws," and the concurrently unfolding discussion of practice as the sole criterion of truth emboldened China's economists to probe areas that were formerly considered forbidden. The Economics Institute of the Chinese Acadamy of Social Sciences revived the institution of biweekly seminars that it had held prior to the Cultural Revolution, and discussions in these seminars was apparently unprecedently wide-ranging and bold. In April 1979, a major theoretical conference was held in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, to discuss the relationship between the plan and market and the law of value. The major thrust of these discussions was that enterprises should be given greater decisionmaking authority, that the market should play a greater regulatory role, and that the law of value should be respected. Although these general conclusions apparently received the support of senior economic policymaker Chen Yun, the logic behind many of the proposals put forward was sharply at odds with Chen's approach to economics.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 26 (1993)
Issue (Month): 3 (April)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=110901 |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:26:y:1993:i:3:p:3-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Chris Nguyen to update the entry or send us the correct address
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.