IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/chinec/v15y1981i2p37-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three Times Three Equals Nine is not as Good as two Times five Equals ten

Author

Listed:
  • Mu Jiajun
  • Ji Jincheng

Abstract

Grain planting in Songjiang County in the suburbs of Shanghai Municipality is basically the triple cropping system; namely, planting barley, naked-barley or wheat in winter, planting early maturing rice in the second year [i.e., spring of the following year] after harvesting the winter crop, and then planting late rice as the third crop. With the triple cropping system, approximately 1,400 >u>jin>/u> per >u>mu>/u> [10.5 tons per ha] of grain is produced each year. Production has remained at this level over the past few years. The problems associated with the triple cropping system, such as limits of the growing seasons, labor bottlenecks and intensity, increase in production costs, shortage of fertilizers, decrease in soil fertility, etc., are becoming more and more severe. From cadres to the masses, everybody has his own personal reaction to this matter.

Suggested Citation

  • Mu Jiajun & Ji Jincheng, 1981. "Three Times Three Equals Nine is not as Good as two Times five Equals ten," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 37-44, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:15:y:1981:i:2:p:37-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=64GM82Q388012546
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:chinec:v:15:y:1981:i:2:p:37-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.