IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/challe/v66y2023i5-6p123-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Not a Thing” Seven Legal Reasons the Federal “Debt Ceiling” is Null & Void

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Hockett

Abstract

After 12 years of “Debt Ceiling” nonsense, it is gratifying at last to see many officials and scholars now casting doubt on the Ceiling’s validity. It is somewhat regrettable, however, that attention appears to be focused upon the 14th Amendment alone where these doubts are concerned. The Debt Ceiling as it would be applied by today’s rump Republican faction is indeed an affront to the Debt Clause of the 14th Amendment. But it is also an affront to the 1974 Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which made the Federal Budget its own “ceiling”—and “floor”—not to mention additional Constitutional provisions including the “Take Care” and “Presentment” Clauses, along with familiar canons of statutory construction including the Later-in-Time Rule, the Lex Specialis Doctrine, the Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine, and the Absurd Result Principle. This Essay elaborates these seven grounds and concludes with a prudential recommendation that the Senate, the President, and all serious Members of the House or Representatives declare the “Debt Ceiling” null and void, thereafter ignoring it henceforth.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Hockett, 2023. "“Not a Thing” Seven Legal Reasons the Federal “Debt Ceiling” is Null & Void," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(5-6), pages 123-131, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:66:y:2023:i:5-6:p:123-131
    DOI: 10.1080/05775132.2023.2272531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/05775132.2023.2272531
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/05775132.2023.2272531?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:66:y:2023:i:5-6:p:123-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCHA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.