IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/challe/v63y2020i6p319-331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Happened in Bolivia’s 2019 Vote Count?

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Long
  • David Rosnick
  • Cavan Kharrazian
  • Kevin Cashman

Abstract

On October 20, 2019, Bolivia held presidential and parliamentary elections. Shortly after preliminary results indicated that incumbent president Evo Morales had won the election in the first round, the Organization of American States Electoral Observation Mission in Bolivia issued an initial postelection press release, which expressed “its deep concern and surprise at the drastic and hard-to-explain change in the trend of the preliminary results revealed after the closing of the polls,” without providing any evidence for its claims. We analyzed the claims from the Organization of American States and found: • The preliminary results from the “quick count” for the first 83.85 percent of the vote count are consistent with a final projected result of Evo Morales winning the election outright with a more than 10 percentage point victory; • Neither the OAS mission nor any other party has demonstrated that there were widespread or systematic irregularities in the elections of October 20, 2019; • Neither the quick count nor the official count exhibit significant changes in voting trends in the final results; rather, the same well-known trend, explainable by differences in voter preferences in different geographical areas, is evident in both counts; • The legally binding vote count—the official count—did not stop for any significant period of time; and • It is unclear how the OAS mission’s objections regarding the quick count would affect the official count.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Long & David Rosnick & Cavan Kharrazian & Kevin Cashman, 2020. "What Happened in Bolivia’s 2019 Vote Count?," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(6), pages 319-331, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:63:y:2020:i:6:p:319-331
    DOI: 10.1080/05775132.2020.1711490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/05775132.2020.1711490
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/05775132.2020.1711490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:challe:v:63:y:2020:i:6:p:319-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MCHA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.