IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/zwipol/v65y2016i2p138-156n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digitalisierung und Arbeiten 4.0 – Reformbedarf für die Alterssicherung?: 10 Thesen zur geplanten Altersvorsorge- (bzw. Rentenversicherungs)pflicht für Selbstständige – Wie es (nicht) funktionieren wird

Author

Listed:
  • Lutz Andreas

    (Andreas Lutz, Verband der Gründer und Selbstständigen Deutschland (VGSD) e. V., Altheimer Eck 13, 80331 München, Tel.: (089) 5165 7980, E-Mail: lutz@vgsd.de)

Abstract

Most self-employed individuals in Germany are so far not compulsory members of a pension scheme. Unions and social democrats have developed the concept of an „Erwerbstätigenversicherung“ – a type of insurance cumpulsory for all those generating income via labour. In addition to the self-employed, this group theoretically includes civil servants – but they are supposed to join at a much later stage.Conservative politicians and employers' associations favour a system in which the self-employed have to prove that they are saving enough to avoid poverty in old age, but are, to some extent at least, free in their choice of investments.The author develops 10 propositions regarding what is likely to succeed or not, this in an attempt to provide politicians with a checklist. For instance, the ability to pay for a pension scheme of any kind is limited as a result of very high minimum health insurance payments (specific to self-employed individuals in Germany). Among others, this affects a large number of self-employed women who are working part-time. The author states that neither concept will bear fruit if this is not changed.Another key hypothesis is that including self-employed individuals in the state-run pension system will delay the more substantial reforms necessary to make the system future-proof – such as a dynamic retirement age or immigration and integration of skilled workers to Germany.

Suggested Citation

  • Lutz Andreas, 2016. "Digitalisierung und Arbeiten 4.0 – Reformbedarf für die Alterssicherung?: 10 Thesen zur geplanten Altersvorsorge- (bzw. Rentenversicherungs)pflicht für Selbstständige – Wie es (nicht) funktionieren wi," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 65(2), pages 138-156, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:65:y:2016:i:2:p:138-156:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-2016-0012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2016-0012
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfwp-2016-0012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gasche, Martin & Rausch, Johannes, 2012. "Auswirkungen einer Versicherungspflicht der Selbständigen in der Gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung," MEA discussion paper series 201212, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    2. Heinrich Jess, 2010. "Ökonomische Aspekte einer Erwerbstätigenversicherung," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 90(5), pages 332-339, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:mea:meawpa:12264 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Gasche, Martin & Rausch, Johannes, 2012. "Auswirkungen einer Versicherungspflicht der Selbständigen in der Gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung," MEA discussion paper series 201212, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
    3. Gasche, Martin & Lamla, Bettina, 2012. "Erwartete Altersarmut in Deutschland: Pessimismus und Fehleinschätzungen – Ergebnisse aus der SAVE-Studie," MEA discussion paper series 201213, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:65:y:2016:i:2:p:138-156:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.