IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/zwipol/v49y2000i3p344-364n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Migration needs a NEMP (a New European Migration Policy) and not (only) a German Einwanderungsgesetz

Author

Listed:
  • Straubhaar Thomas

    (HWWA - Hamburg Institute of International Economies, Neuer Jungfernstieg 21, D- 20347 Hamburg)

Abstract

In almost all European countries there is a wide and growing gap between the goals of national immigration policy and its actual outcomes. The main reason for the failure of national migration policies is the loss of effective competence to control today’s migration flows on a national level. Once national governments had closed the front door of legal immigration more or less strictly, most of the entries to fortress Europe occurred through the side door (asylum seekers, refugees, family reunion) or through the back door (illegal immigrants). As a result, there is an increasing need for a common European migration policy. This paper outlines the framework of a NEMP - a New European Migration Policy. NEMP is a first step from national ad hoc regulations towards a more conceptual European migration strategy. The basic idea of NEMP is that it is not the entry or the movement of people from abroad that generates migration problems. Rather, it is “stay” and “work” that may become a controversial issue. Consequently, NEMP advocates a shift of the policy focus from the control of moves to the control of residence and especially control of the illegal activities of illegal foreign workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Straubhaar Thomas, 2000. "New Migration needs a NEMP (a New European Migration Policy) and not (only) a German Einwanderungsgesetz," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 49(3), pages 344-364, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:49:y:2000:i:3:p:344-364:n:8
    DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-2000-0308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2000-0308
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfwp-2000-0308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:49:y:2000:i:3:p:344-364:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.