IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/zwipol/v49y2000i1p51-81n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die WTO auf dem Prüfstand: Zur Notwendigkeit einer Millennium-Runde

Author

Listed:
  • Hindley Brian

    (Emeritus Reader in Trade Policy Economics London School of Economics Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE)

  • Hauser Heinz

    (Universität St. Gallen Schweizerisches Institut für Aussenwirtscha.fi und Angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung (SIAW) Dufourstr. 48 CH - 9000 St. Gallen)

  • Hiemenz Ulrich

    (Director OECD Development Centre 94, rue Chardon Lagache F - 75016 Paris)

Abstract

This economic policy forum addresses the subject “New Challenges for the WTO: Do we need a Millennium Round?”. Brian Hindley has serious doubts whether the Millennium-Round should be revived. While the EU suggests that an agreement on competition policy should be essential for new multilateral trade negotiations, the Departement of Justice which administers competition policy in the US is less enthusiastic about the idea. The same applies to rules on investment. The author discusses both aspects of the EU’s extended agenda proposals and comes to the conclusion, that what is left is a rag bag. A bag that contains some useful issues, some dubious ones, some downright bad ones, but without enough content to fuel a credible multilateral trade negotiation. His conclusion is, that perhaps the case for multilateral agreements on competition policy and investment can be strengthened and if the Commission can do that, it should. The case for a Millennium Round based on the extended agenda is weak.

Suggested Citation

  • Hindley Brian & Hauser Heinz & Hiemenz Ulrich, 2000. "Die WTO auf dem Prüfstand: Zur Notwendigkeit einer Millennium-Runde," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 49(1), pages 51-81, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:49:y:2000:i:1:p:51-81:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-2000-0104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2000-0104
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfwp-2000-0104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:49:y:2000:i:1:p:51-81:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.