IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/zwipol/v45y1996i1p30-57n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ist die Tarifautonomie noch zeitgemäß?

Author

Listed:
  • Franz Wolfgang

    (Universität Konstanz Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften u. Statistik Universitätsstraße 10)

  • Möschel Wernhard

    (Universität Tübingen Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht Wilhelmstr. 7)

  • Paqué Karl-Heinz

    (Institut für Weltwirtschaft an der Universität Kiel)

Abstract

The economic policy forum discusses the question of whether the German system of autonomous wage bargaining is still up-to-date. Wolfgang Franz considers two aspects. First, he examines to what extend the existing unemployment rate can be reduced by wage policy. Due to certain forms of unemployment, this can be done only partly by lower real wages. In addition, he shows that it can be rational for employees as well as for employers to agree on wages which are higher than the equilibrium wage. In the second part, he considers the question of whether centralised or decentralised negotiations over wages are more likely to solve the problem of unemployment. Arguments in favour of both options can be found. The paper concludes with some suggestions to make collective agreements more flexible.

Suggested Citation

  • Franz Wolfgang & Möschel Wernhard & Paqué Karl-Heinz, 1996. "Ist die Tarifautonomie noch zeitgemäß?," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 45(1), pages 30-57, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:45:y:1996:i:1:p:30-57:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-1996-0104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-1996-0104
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfwp-1996-0104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:45:y:1996:i:1:p:30-57:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.