IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/reveco/v58y2007i2p180-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pflege und Gesundheit – zwei ungleiche Schwestern?: Marktversagenstatbestände und institutionelle Konsequenzen

Author

Listed:
  • Sundmacher Torsten

    (Universität Duisburg-Essen, Campus Duisburg, Fachbereich Betriebswirtschaft, Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaftspolitik, Lotharstraße 65, 47048 Duisburg)

Abstract

The Social Long-term Care Insurance (Gesetzliche Pflegeversicherung, GPV) is in a crisis which will clearly intensify without reforms. An important solution strategy is the introduction of competition elements. This concerns the competition between the Long-term Care Insurance as well as the competition between the service providers. In comparison to the Social Health Insurance (Gesetzliche Krankenvereicherung, GKV) this coordination procedure can be found up to now very rarely. It is examined with the help of the market failure theory which market problems can be found in the area of long-term care. Here, nursing goods as well as the market for nursing insurances are examined. In comparison to the GKV, the lacking consumer’s sovereignty and problems with principal-agent-relations aggravate the situation in the GPV. However, other market failures are rather less important. An enlarged discussion of differences between GPV and GKV leads to the question of the institutional arrangement. This concerns on the one hand the possible amount of market and competition in the GPV as well as, on the other hand, the relation between GKV and GPV. In particular the interface problems between both social insurance systems are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sundmacher Torsten, 2007. "Pflege und Gesundheit – zwei ungleiche Schwestern?: Marktversagenstatbestände und institutionelle Konsequenzen," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 58(2), pages 180-202, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:lus:reveco:v:58:y:2007:i:2:p:180-202
    DOI: 10.1515/roe-2007-0205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2007-0205
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/roe-2007-0205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:reveco:v:58:y:2007:i:2:p:180-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.