IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev11d/vy2017i20p65-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rezmives and others against Romania. Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Roxana-Alina PETRARU

    (Rezmives and others against Romania. Case Study)

Abstract

The Romanian penitentiary system suffers from overcrowding, improper detention conditions, insufficient security and medical staff. All these facts often result in a violation of Article 3 of the Convention by the Romanian state, which has led to many convictions and to obligations to pay an amount of over EUR 1.5 million. The agglomeration of the Strasbourg Court with repetitive cases having as its object the violation of Article 3 from the point of view of detention conditions and having the defendant the Romanian State led to the issuing of a pilot decision aimed at applying the appropriate general measures capable of solving the problem of overcrowding and inadequate detention conditions

Suggested Citation

  • Roxana-Alina PETRARU, 2017. "Rezmives and others against Romania. Case Study," Anuarul Universitatii „Petre Andrei” din Iasi / Year-Book „Petre Andrei” University from Iasi, Fascicula: Drept, Stiinte Economice, Stiinte Politice / Fascicle: Law, Economic Sciences, Political Scien, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 0(20), pages 65-68, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev11d:v::y:2017:i:20:p:65-68
    DOI: 10.18662/upalaw/04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev11d:v::y:2017:i:20:p:65-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edituralumen.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.