Author
Listed:
- Petro Patsurkivskyy
(Doctor of Law, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Law at Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University (Chernivtsi, Ukraine))
- Ruslana Havrylyuk
(Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Public Law at Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University (Chernivtsi, Ukraine))
- Illia Yuriichuk
(Assistant Professor of the Department of public law at Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University (Chernivtsi, Ukraine))
Abstract
The article examines the phenomenon of mediation as a value of a developed civil society from the ideological and methodological positions of the anthroposociocultural approach. The general historical conditions of the emergence of mediation and its anthroposociocultural code, paradigmatic types of mediation and the most important properties of each of them are analyzed. The article reveals the value nature of mediation as a Copernican revolution in ideology and methods of constructive resolution of conflicts between individuals and their communities. The conclusions are substantiated that: mediation belongs to the genus of anthroposociocultural values as their qualitatively distinguished type; mediation is functionally related to fundamental universal human values - human rights, the rule of law and pluralistic democracy - as a tool for their protection by human beings themselves in the form of a joint solution of interpersonal conflicts by their own carriers with the help of professional mediators; modern science distinguishes at least two paradigmatically different types of mediation - traditional mediation and narrative mediation; mediation of the first type as a value is applied mainly to the solution of interpersonal conflicts, and mediation of the second type is mainly applied to the solution of conflicts between human communities in polyidentical societies.
Suggested Citation
Petro Patsurkivskyy & Ruslana Havrylyuk & Illia Yuriichuk, 2020.
"Mediation as an Anthroposociocultural Value,"
European Journal of Law and Public Administration, Editura LUMEN, vol. 7(2), pages 137-150, December.
Handle:
RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:7:y:2020:i:2:p:137-150
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.2/134
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)
- K15 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Civil Law; Common Law
- K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:ejlpa1:v:7:y:2020:i:2:p:137-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.