IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lpe/efijnl/200116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analisa Peringkat Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Kabupaten/Kota

Author

Listed:
  • Thia Jasmina

    (Researcher, Institute for Economic and Social Research, Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia, Jakarta)

  • Akhmad Bayhaqi

    (Researcher, Institute for Economic and Social Research, Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia, Jakarta)

  • Ledi Trialdi

    (Researcher, Institute for Economic and Social Research, Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia, Jakarta)

  • Usman

    (Researcher, Institute for Economic and Social Research, Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia, Jakarta)

Abstract

The increasing poverty in Indonesia has encouraged Indonesian government to place poverty alleviation program as a core program in economic development strategy. The implementation of the program will be more effective and well targeted if local government performs significant roles in poverty reduction, especially after regional autonomy. The papers will analyse local government poverty alleviation program based on the public/development expenditure and local government strategic planning. The local government budget analysis is conducted using the proportion of public spending to selected sectors which considered pro-poor and using public spending incidence analysis to observe how effective the budget is allocated for the poor. The sectors selected are agriculture, transportation, education, health and housing. Whereas, to analyse local government awareness in reducing poverty, qualitative analysis conducted by exploring specific poverty alleviation programs in the local government strategic planning/program. Based on the proportion of each sector to total expenditure in 1999/2000 budget for 288 kabupaten/kota, the highest average allocation expenditure is for transportation (26%), followed by education (12%) and housing (10%). While allocation for agriculture and health sector each are only 5%. However, the incidence analysis shows that the most pro-poor budget is agriculture, education and housing, which means the spending for these sectors are more beneficial to the poorest 20%. While, for transportation and health the budget policy tends to be neutral and not pro-poor, which means the spending for these sectors give the same benefit for the poorest 20% and the richest 20% or even tends to be more beneficial to the richest 20%. On the other hand, the qualitative analysis shows that from 40 kabupaten/kota, only 18 kabupaten/kota that explicitly elaborate poverty alleviation program in the strategic planning / program (Propeda / Renstra).

Suggested Citation

  • Thia Jasmina & Akhmad Bayhaqi & Ledi Trialdi & Usman, 2001. "Analisa Peringkat Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Kabupaten/Kota," Economics and Finance in Indonesia, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, vol. 49, pages 423-449, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:lpe:efijnl:200116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lpem.org/repec/lpe/efijnl/200116.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lpe:efijnl:200116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Halley Yudhistira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuinid.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.