IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lif/jrgelg/v8y2019p477-489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Overview of Public Sector Budget Monitoring & Evaluation Systems for Gender Equality: Lessons from Uganda and Rwanda

Author

Listed:
  • Nqobile Sikhosana

    (Department of Public Administration, University of Fort Hare, Independence Avenue, Bhisho, King Williams Town, Eastern Cape, South Africa)

  • Ogochukwu Nzewi

Abstract

Citizen expectations regarding government accountability and transparency are rising around the globe and this has given politicians and public administrators an obligation to account for their actions more regularly than in the past. Although a number of African countries have made notable strides in public expenditure management, citizens` level of trust in government is eroding owing to administrative challenges such as corruption, embezzlement of public funds and ineffective delivery of public services. Against this backdrop, public sector budget monitoring and evaluation has emerged to spur efficiency, effectiveness and transparency within organisations and institutions in relation to meeting developmental goals and outcomes. One of the socio-economic ills prevalent in Africa is the failure to channel resources towards the achievement of gender outcomes as shown by existing gender disparities. Using desktop research, this article responds to this ultimate concern by examining the extent to which Uganda and Rwanda have played a leading role in the implementation of budget M&E to achieve specific gender outcomes. Results show that although a number of countries have transformed their budget monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, only a few have managed to align these systems to gender equality goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Nqobile Sikhosana & Ogochukwu Nzewi, 2019. "An Overview of Public Sector Budget Monitoring & Evaluation Systems for Gender Equality: Lessons from Uganda and Rwanda," Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, Lifescience Global, vol. 8, pages 477-489.
  • Handle: RePEc:lif:jrgelg:v:8:y:2019:p:477-489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lifescienceglobal.com/independent-journals/journal-of-reviews-on-global-economics/volume-8/85-abstract/jrge/3641-abstract-an-overview-of-public-sector-budget-monitoring-evaluation-systems-for-gender-equality-lessons-from-uganda-and-rwanda
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Njeri. S. Ngacha & Julie McDonald, 2023. "Monitoring and Evaluation Budgetary Practices on Project Service Delivery," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(3), pages 1-34, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lif:jrgelg:v:8:y:2019:p:477-489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Faisal Ameer Khan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lifescienceglobal.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.