IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lif/jrgelg/v2y2013p375-389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fighting for Rents: Agricultural Windfall Gains and Social Change in Land-Abundant Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Anna K. Hvid

    () (Technical University of Denmark)

Abstract

In recent years, a global increase in demand for agricultural commodities and land has contributed to increasing agricultural prices. This trend can be expected to continue in the future, and may result in significantly higher land rents. This paper investigates the potential distributional effects of increasing land rents in land-abundant developing countries from a theoretical viewpoint, and provides historical case examples to support the theoretical propositions. It is proposed that the specific characteristics of a rent-generating natural resource have implications for the concentration of economic and political power and hence the distribution of rents. Specifically, when it comes to agricultural land, the characteristics of land imply that the organizational capacity of farmers is a crucial determinant of the distribution of agricultural rents. The historical case examples indicate that the extent of organizational capacity may be determined by land inequality, the heterogeneity of farmers and the political environment

Suggested Citation

  • Anna K. Hvid, 2013. "Fighting for Rents: Agricultural Windfall Gains and Social Change in Land-Abundant Developing Countries," Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, Lifescience Global, vol. 2, pages 375-389.
  • Handle: RePEc:lif:jrgelg:v:2:y:2013:p:375-389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lifescienceglobal.com/independent-journals/journal-of-reviews-on-global-economics/volume-2?id=333
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hvid Anna, 2015. "Increasing Natural Resource Rents from Farmland: A Curse or a Blessing for the Rural Poor?," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 59-78, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lif:jrgelg:v:2:y:2013:p:375-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Faisal Ameer Khan). General contact details of provider: http://www.lifescienceglobal.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.