IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Inbound M&A to Japan: Cherry Picking Versus Rescue Mission?

Listed author(s):
  • Ralf Bebenroth

    (Kobe University)

This paper investigates differences in targets overtaken by cross-border bidders versus domestic ones. The literature from the selection theory argues that there is "cherry picking." Put simply, cross-border bidders overtake the comparably better performing targets. In contrast, domestic bidders acquire weaker targets what can be termed as "rescue mission." Targets in the study were investigated to see if this statement holds true. The results show that cross-border targets did not perform better but performed worse than domestic ones. According to my sample, I have to conclude that there is no "cherry picking" of cross-border acquisitions. This lends support to the idea that foreign bidders probably come to the acquisition target at a later stage. To put it differently, Japanese firms were being overtaken by foreign bidders in cases where no domestic firm was interested in overtaking the target. Reasons are discussed.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University in its journal Kobe Economic & Business Review.

Volume (Year): 54 (2010)
Issue (Month): (March)
Pages: 1-16

in new window

Handle: RePEc:kob:review:mar2010::v:54:p:1-16
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Rokkodai 2-1, Nada, Kobe 657-8501

Phone: +81-(0)78 803 7036
Fax: 81-78-803-7059
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kob:review:mar2010::v:54:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Office of Promoting Research Collaboration, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.