IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/journl/v7y2015i2p63-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Arbitration and Mediation – Alternative Methods of Settling Disputes between Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Dragos Marian Radulescu

Abstract

Since ancient times people have made the trade, the need for those goods which they could not produce. Whether it is in kind or barter exchange or payment of goods with different amounts of money depending on their value, such activities were creating conflicts. Conflicts whose solution must be found quickly, because the lack of goods and trade could create problems in society. Such people, in the absence of a judgment of a State authority (either does not exist initial or later was too expensive and take too long until a definitive solution) resorted to various means of resolving conflicts, of which we will highlight whereas, mediation and arbitration. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of the two procedures to resolve conflicts arising between professionals and there are advantages and disadvantages for those who use mediation or arbitration.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragos Marian Radulescu, 2015. "Arbitration and Mediation – Alternative Methods of Settling Disputes between Professionals," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 7(2), pages 63-67, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:63-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/khe7nr2/Radulescu_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/khe7nr2/Radulescu_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iancu Aurel, 2007. "Convergenţa reală şi integrarea," Revista OEconomica, Romanian Society for Economic Science, Revista OEconomica, issue 03, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:63-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Adi Sava). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.