IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/journl/v5y2013i1specialp108-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brief Theoretical Considerations on the Review of the European Union Constituent Treaties

Author

Listed:
  • Roxana-Mariana Popescu

    ("Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University)

Abstract

In the European Union, the possibility of reviewing the constituent treaties contributes to the adaptation of legislation and European policies to the new requirements of the international life. As it is well known, before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, there was only one procedure for reviewing the Treaties. The Lisbon Treaty regulates three procedures for reviewing the treaties: one ordinary and two simplified. Regardless, however, of the initiated procedure, Member States must unanimously adopt the review of provisions in cause. The review procedures are found in Article 48 of the Treaty on European Union.

Suggested Citation

  • Roxana-Mariana Popescu, 2013. "Brief Theoretical Considerations on the Review of the European Union Constituent Treaties," Knowledge Horizons - Economics, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 5(Special 1), pages 108-110, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:5:y:2013:i:1special:p:108-110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/2013_KHE_PDF_Vol_5_SI_1/KHE_Vol_5_SIss_1_108to110.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/2013_KHE_PDF_Vol_5_SI_1/KHE_Vol_5_SIss_1_108to110.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Review Treaties; the European Union; the ordinary procedure; the simplified procedure; bridging clause;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K30 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:journl:v:5:y:2013:i:1special:p:108-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.