IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kea/keappr/ker-200612-22-2-07.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Test of the Regional Income Inequality in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Eungwon Nho

    (Chungnam National University)

Abstract

The paper estimates Korean gini coefficients of non-agricultural household income distribution for 16 provincial-level administrative regions and the nation by using public use micro data of National Survey of Household Income and Expenditures in 1996 and 2000, and tests hypotheses about changes of gini coefficients between the two time periods and across regions in 2000. The standard error of the gini index is estimated by jackknife and bootstrap methods rather than the traditional delta method because of the complexity of the latter. National gini coefficient of household current income increased by 23% from 0.3257 in 1996 to 0.3934 in 2000, while changes in regional gini indices ranged from -1.7% for Jeju to +35.6% for Geonggi-do. But, the changes in gini index are not statistically significant at 10% significance level in three regions: Jeju(-1.7% from 0.3730 to 0.3667), Busan(0.74% from 0.3799 to 0.3827) and Jeonnam( 4.99% from 0.3949 to 0.4146). Regional gini indices of household total income in 2000 ranged from 0.3442 in Ulsan to 0.4528 in Gyeongbuk, but those of similar magnitude are not statistically significant. For example, Busan��s income inequality(0.3852) does not differ significantly from 10 regions including Incheon(0.3614) to Daejeon(0.4107).

Suggested Citation

  • Eungwon Nho, 2006. "Statistical Test of the Regional Income Inequality in Korea," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 22, pages 341-365.
  • Handle: RePEc:kea:keappr:ker-200612-22-2-07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://keapaper.kea.ne.kr/RePEc/kea/keappr/KER-200612-22-2-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    gini coefficient; standard error of gini; bootstrap method; jackknife method;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kea:keappr:ker-200612-22-2-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: KEA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/keaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.