IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kea/keappr/ker-200012-16-2-07.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Procedural Requirements and US EPA's Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Seung-Kuk Cho

    (Hansei University)

Abstract

In the Asbestos Ban of 1989, there are two main decisions: (1) EPA decision whether to ban a product (this can be referred to as the standard-setting), and (2) its decision when to ban the product (this can be referred to as the priority-setting). Accordingly, given the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) mandate to consider participation by external parties seriously, external parties could affect the priority-setting process as well as the standard-setting process in important and predictable ways. Using probit and ordered probit models, this study will infer the role of the active involvement of special interest groups in the form of written comments when making these two regulatory decisions

Suggested Citation

  • Seung-Kuk Cho, 2000. "Procedural Requirements and US EPA's Decision-Making," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 16, pages 305-319.
    • Handle: RePEc:kea:keappr:ker-200012-16-2-07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://keapaper.kea.ne.kr/RePEc/kea/keappr/KER-200012-16-2-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Procedural Requirements; EPA Decision-Making;

    JEL classification:

    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kea:keappr:ker-200012-16-2-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: KEA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/keaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.