IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kea/keappr/ker-199512-11-1-08.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entry Barriers, Exit Option and a Theory of Optimal Obfuscation

Author

Listed:
  • Chung Sik Yoo

    (Yonsei University)

Abstract

In this paper, a typical gainers-losers influence competition model is modified to introduce uninformed losers who share the loss but are subject to political rhetorics of indirect policies. Under symmetric treatment of tax and subsidy in deadweight loss increase caused by indirect policies, an increase in the degree of policy obfus-cation is found to lead to a decrease in the equilibrium amount of migration under the condition that the average subsidy is greater than the average tax. Whether migration effect (multiplied by the factor) is more likely to provide a negative incentive for policy obfuscation depends on the specification of the optimal solution of entry barriers to gainers group. It is also found that the degree of transfer tends to be negatively related with the degree of policy obfuscation. This simple experiment generated an interesting and important observation; in assessing the political rationales of indirect policies, we should look at at least two more aspects of them, migration and private political response effects, in addition to their direct political economic cost and benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Chung Sik Yoo, 1995. "Entry Barriers, Exit Option and a Theory of Optimal Obfuscation," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 121-134.
  • Handle: RePEc:kea:keappr:ker-199512-11-1-08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://keapaper.kea.ne.kr/RePEc/kea/keappr/KER-199512-11-1-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kea:keappr:ker-199512-11-1-08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: KEA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/keaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.