IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/theord/v99y2025i1d10.1007_s11238-025-10065-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fair division with money and prices: bid & sell versus divide & choose

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Bogomolnaia

    (University of Glasgow
    CNRS)

  • Hervé Moulin

    (University of Glasgow
    Higher SChool of Economics)

Abstract

We divide efficiently a pile of indivisible goods in common property, using cash transfers to ensure fairness among agents with utility linear in money. We compare three cognitively feasible and privacy preserving division rules in terms of the guarantees (worst case utility) they offer to the participants. In the first version of Divide & Choose to n agents, they bid for the role of Divider then everyone bids on the shares of the Divider’s partition. In the second version each agent announces a partition and they all bid to select the most efficient one. In the Bid & Sell rule the agents bid for the role of Seller: with two agents the smallest bid defines the Seller who then charges any price constrained only by her winning bid. Both rules reward subadditive utilities and penalise superadditive ones, and B&S more so than both D&C-s. B&S is also better placed to collect a larger share of the surplus when agents play safe.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Bogomolnaia & Hervé Moulin, 2025. "Fair division with money and prices: bid & sell versus divide & choose," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 407-443, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:99:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-025-10065-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11238-025-10065-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-025-10065-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11238-025-10065-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:99:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-025-10065-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.