Author
Abstract
Logistic regression (LR) is a widely used and well-established tool for classification tasks, valued for its simplicity and interpretability. However, its reliance on linear separators transformed by a sigmoid function limits its flexibility, particularly when dealing with non-linear decision boundaries. To address this limitation, Tehrani et al. proposed an extension of LR where the linear separator is replaced by a piecewise-linear known as Choquet integral. While effective, this approach, known as “Choquistic regression”, faces the curse of dimensionality, as its parameter count grows exponentially with the number of input features. To mitigate this issue, simplified variants of the Choquet integral, such as the 2-additive Choquet integral, have been proposed. These variants restrict interactions to at most two features, significantly reducing complexity while delivering competitive performance compared to unrestricted models. However, the monotonicity constraints imposed by the Choquistic approach remain a limitation, reducing its applicability to real-world scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel formulation of logistic regression that integrates the Choquet integral, with parameters defined through a cooperative game framework. Additionally, we explore game-based aggregation functions such as the multilinear model, which also captures feature interactions effectively. To overcome the curse of dimensionality, we utilize 2-additive games, which significantly reduce the number of parameters while preserving competitive accuracy. This reduction in complexity is empirically validated through a comparative study of restricted and unrestricted logistic regression variants on a COVID-19 dataset. Furthermore, the results highlight the interpretability advantages of these models, demonstrating their practical value in real-world applications.
Suggested Citation
Guilherme Dean Pelegrina & Miguel Couceiro & Cristiano Torezzan & Leonardo Tomazeli Duarte, 2025.
"Game-theoretic extensions of logistic regression,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 71-95, September.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:theord:v:99:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-025-10062-y
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-025-10062-y
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:99:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-025-10062-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.