IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/theord/v99y2025i1d10.1007_s11238-025-10050-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining the Shapley value and the equal division solution: an overview

Author

Listed:
  • René Brink

    (VU University)

  • Yukihiko Funaki

    (Waseda University)

Abstract

We give an overview of several results on the axiomatization and strategic implementation of cooperative game solutions that combine marginalism and egalitarianism. The best-known marginalist solution for cooperative transferable utility games is the Shapley value, while the equal division solution is the most direct egalitarian solution. Both solutions have been axiomatized in various ways, starting with Shapley (1953)’s original axiomatization of his value. His axiomatization heavily relies on a basis for the game space, specifically the unanimity (game) basis. We review several contributions from the literature where using a different basis, and using similar axioms as for the Shapley value, gives the equal division solution or other solutions that combine features of the Shapley value and the equal division solution. We specifically focus on the classes of egalitarian Shapley values and discounted Shapley values. Besides axiomatizations, we discuss strategic implementation of these solutions, where the difference between the mechanisms implementing the different solutions is with respect to the possibility of the negotiations to break down.

Suggested Citation

  • René Brink & Yukihiko Funaki, 2025. "Combining the Shapley value and the equal division solution: an overview," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 285-316, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:99:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-025-10050-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11238-025-10050-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-025-10050-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11238-025-10050-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:99:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-025-10050-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.