IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/theord/v98y2025i4d10.1007_s11238-025-10024-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expected utility as an expression of linear preference intensity

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés Perea

    (Maastricht University)

Abstract

Following Gilboa and Schmeidler (Games Econ Behav 44:184–194, 2003) we consider a scenario where the decision maker holds, for every possible probabilistic belief about the states, a preference relation over his choices. For this setting, Gilboa and Schmeidler have offered conditions that allow for an expected utility representation. Their central condition is the diversity axiom which states that for every strict ordering of at most four choices there should be a belief at which it obtains. It turns out that this axiom excludes many natural cases, even when there are no weakly dominated choices. We replace the diversity axiom by two new axioms—three choice and four choice linear preference intensity, which reflect the assumption that the preference intensity between two choices varies linearly with the belief. It is shown that in the absence of weakly dominated choices, the resulting set of axioms characterizes precisely those scenarios that admit an expected utility representation. In particular, our set of axioms covers a significantly broader class of scenarios than the Gilboa-Schmeidler axioms.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés Perea, 2025. "Expected utility as an expression of linear preference intensity," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 98(4), pages 561-598, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:98:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11238-025-10024-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11238-025-10024-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-025-10024-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11238-025-10024-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:98:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11238-025-10024-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.