IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/rqfnac/v16y2001i1p81-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Investment Risk Based on Tail Thickness

Author

Listed:
  • Dargahi-Noubary, G R
  • Smith, Wm Steven

Abstract

In recent years, both institutional and individual investors have come to rely heavily upon techniques for analyzing (defining and measuring) risk. In this respect, the issue that continues to require the attention of academic researchers and practitioners alike is how to concisely define investment risk and, more importantly, how to best measure it. Selecting an appropriate risk definition involves trade-offs among ease of measurement, forecast ability, and intuition of individual investors. The purpose of this paper is to present an alternative index for measuring unconditional (or total) risk. The proposed measure reflects behavior in general, and thickness in particular, of the lower tail of the distribution of returns. We therefore argue it provides a more useful and reasonable index because, unlike measures frequently used, its estimation depends upon the most relevant data from the sample distribution. We describe risk analysis based on lower tail behavior and identify its advantages over existing methods. Finally, using data of weekly returns to the CREF Stock Fund, we provide an empirical example to illustrate the technique. Copyright 2001 by Kluwer Academic Publishers

Suggested Citation

  • Dargahi-Noubary, G R & Smith, Wm Steven, 2001. "Measuring Investment Risk Based on Tail Thickness," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 81-93, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:16:y:2001:i:1:p:81-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0924-865X/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:rqfnac:v:16:y:2001:i:1:p:81-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.